Google Gestapo

Deep State 08192

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32)

This is a speculative account based on personal experience and broad reading. In no way is it a substitute for a proper legal discovery process – but it could be useful in guiding such a process.

The recent arbitrary deletion with no appeal by Twitter of two accounts – one belonging to my friend Alt-Right white male Roger Stone [1] and the other to an Alt-Left black female activist who goes by the name of “Charlie Peach” [2] and reminds me of my friend Cynthia McKinney, [3] should be the death rattle of #GoogleGestapo. If Roger Stone and “Charlie Peach” were to sue Twitter together, in combination with my own lawsuit against three apparatchiks and their many co-conspirators, [4] and the new potentially formidable case by Prager University against Google, YouTube, and DOES 1-25, [5] I believe these three cases and perhaps others might converge in a most constructive manner assuredly in the public interest. The above juxtaposition is important – the Deep State is seeking to censor and in some cases digitally assassinate both those on the right and those on the left who challenge official narratives. This is discrimination based on political affiliation or belief.

While I identify the Deep State as the ultimate antagonist, it is the Zionists who have refined the system that the Deep State now uses to control social media and digitally assassinate critics and those espousing conservative values or support for the US Constitution as well as opposition to the prevailing “Israel First” mantra at the federal, state, and local levels. [6] “Hate speech” and related filters are code for repressing those critical of the Zionist and Deep State narratives, known in the aggregate as “Alternative Media.” [7]

I have found it helpful to distinguish early on between a few very powerful extremist Zionists who serve a foreign agenda that calls for the complete subversion of the United States of America (USA) and other countries, and millions of loyal decent Jews world-wide, nine million of whom reside in the USA. My focus is on a limited number of extremists who are certain they are above all laws; they do not represent decent Jews – or the established religion of Judaism – as a whole. My focus is also only on social media control, not on other methods used by the Zionists to subvert entire countries. [8]

In combination with false flag [9] events that perpetuate a climate of fear and astronomic levels of spending on a militarized domestic total surveillance and control system in which police forces abandon community-based policing and go straight to treating the public as the enemy, with a complicit Mainstream Media (MSM), #GoogleGestapo has emerged as the social control mechanism of the 21st Century, not only blocking over 400 websites [10] (I suspect the number is much higher) but censoring millions and digitally assassinating tens of thousands of individuals, many of them in the USA. The intent of the Deep State has recently been made clear by one of its fronts, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR): dissidents and those who question authority should be treated as “domestic terrorists.” [11]

I do not address the related issue of #GoogleGestapo as a global surveillance [12] enterprise violating all rights to anonymity, identity, privacy, and security – my focus here and now is on discrimination. [13]

It bears noting in passing that Fourth Amendment protections against search and seizure do not apply to third party cloud holdings – this is yet another sucking chest wound in the GooglePlex waiting for the law to catch up.

The Prager University team includes Alan Dershowitz, who is both a celebrated scholar and defense lawyer and an Israel Firster [14] – a mixed blessing when one is suing a Zionist system that is relied upon by the Deep State. Having this enormous but conflicted talent on the team reminds me of the Warren Commission, where Allen Dulles, the mastermind of the John F. Kennedy (JFK) assassination, was put on the Commission by Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ), the man who signed JFK’s death warrant, to ensure that the falsehoods being put forward by the government were adhered to. [15] The Plaintiffs may wish to consider adding someone like Judge Andrew Napolitano to their team, and be most wary of Dershowitz negotiating a pro forma settlement behind the scenes that results in a limited victory that forestalls the much larger Title 7 challenge to the entire #GoogleGestapo system administered for the Deep State by the Zionists. I predict You Tube will quickly restore the videos in question and apologize, so as to stop this case, potentially the Title 7 [16] case of the century, from going to discovery, trial, and logical expansion.

Here is a simple example of a discovery question that the Prager U team could ask, given that they have over fifty videos that have been banned from YouTube:

Provide a list of all banned videos in the past five years, the specific reasons why each video was banned; and the identity of and contact information for each of the related individuals or organizations for each of the banned videos.

This matters because no one, anywhere, has been able to compile a list of all banned videos. The legal discovery process is the only means by which we can compel the revelation of this vital information while assuring that the resulting information is of evidentiary quality.

Properly done, a larger challenge would also document through a legal discovery process – and then hold accountable – organizations such as Kaspersky, Rolling Stone, Slate, Mother Jones, and others that have been lazy and allowed Zionist trolls to “game” their reporting systems and digitally assassinate individuals critical of Zionist Israel (or skeptical of the Deep State narrative) by submitting false reports of bullying, spamming, hating, and even – the latest – “X-Rated Content” such that entire web sites are blocked from being accessed. As Congress has recently determined, the social media endeavors – which should be but are not regulated as public utilities [17] – have been cutting corners on screening content, and been severely remiss in both technical and human quality control. [18] As most cases against the #GoogleGestapo monolith should show if legal discovery is pursued, there is both a failure to be serious in terms of properly screening content, and a double standard – those that agree with the Deep State – or serve the needs of the Deep State – are allowed to threaten assassination, spew hateful language, and crowd-stalk at will. Those that do not agree with the Deep State are at the capricious mercy of an unregulated system that excels at censorship and crowd-stalking with impunity. [19]

#GoogleGestapo Overview

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and In-Q-Tel, both early sponsors of Google and other social media innovations, clearly understood the value of these enterprises to create a desired “total surveillance” architecture. [20] It was the Zionists, however, who appear to have perfected a pervasive blend of people, organizations, and technologies to achieve persistent and pervasive censorship and crowd-stalking that is now in the service of the Deep State, both in the USA and around the world.

Below are the key elements of #GoogleGestapo based on my broad reading and direct personal experience. Pending proper legal discovery, I speculate that all levels are connected – this is a system.

• Deep State – banking families including Vatican, City of London, Wall Street [21]
• Zionist Government of Israel/Benjamin Netanyahu/Mossad [22]
• American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Anti-Defamation League (ADL) [23]
• Eric Schmidt, Arnon Milchan, George Soros, Media Matters and many more
• Complicit Internet services companies including Facebook, MeetUp, Twitter
• Paid sub-contractors that do live-streaming defamation on command
• Paid trolls — Israeli reservists, ADL, Media Matters and others
• Volunteer trolls too stupid to know they are being lied to — sayonim
• Dumb algorithms and lack of investment in ethics, human oversight, etc. by design
• “Shadow banning” (demonetization), subscription list neutralization, service cancellation [24]
• Lack of government regulation, not holding social media to anti-discrimination standards

Not included in my own experience with #GoogleGestapo, but highly pertinent to YouTube’s lack of professionalism in both algorithms and human quality control and respect for customers given the ease with which false reports can destroy entire channels, is the entire matter of grand-fathered changed terms of service, moronic keyword and meta data restrictions, and malicious copyright strikes (to include the destruction of negative reviews of a product) and copyright extortion. [25]

My Personal Experience

Live-Streamed Defamation

On 13 June I did a live-streamed interview with George Webb, whom I respect very much. He was being “handled” at the time by one Jason Goodman with Patricia Negron as his partner. In the course of that interview, [26] I raised the prospect of Goodman himself being handled – perhaps unwittingly – by the Mossad. I speculate now that legal discovery will reveal both monthly payments to Goodman on the order of $3,000 a month, and a pattern of email and cellular contacts suggestive that Goodman has been taking direction, first toward undermining George Webb (who was getting too close to the truth about the Awan brothers being patsies for a Mossad operation via Debbie Wasserman Schultz, spying on and blackmailing Members of Congress) and then #UNRIG, Earth Intelligence Network, and me. [27]

From that day forward, Goodman began a campaign of defamation, video slander, crowd-stalking libelous commentary, and tortuous interference that I have carefully documented. I will not litigate this case in public. Goodman and his many co-conspirators will have their day in court – but I note with interest that YouTube, a surrogate of Google, has not – despite my repeated complaints – deleted any of the many slanderous videos by Goodman, Negon, and “Queen Tut” now known to be Susan Lutzky. Based on my personal experience, I speculate that #GoogleGestapo – the full list of elements yet to be defined through legal discovery – is a co-conspirator with those who seek to manipulate public perception with aggressive character assassination and discrimination, the “Alt Right” and pro-Trumpers being top targets at this time. [28]

YouTube appears to be the most prominent element within which slander and libel occur daily – those with pro-Zionist opinions who parrot the government party line are protected – they slander and libel with impunity – while those who challenge Zionist atrocities and improprieties and the government party line find themselves de-monetized (“shadow-banned”) or digitally assassinated – in many cases an entire life’s work destroyed – with no recourse.

Below is a table of specific slanderous videos posted to YouTube (in red), and specific libelous crowd-stalking endeavors against third party videos (in black) in which I am interviewed, correlated with the collapse of our non-profit educational crowd-funding campaign at IndieGoGo (in green). [29]

Timeline Corrected ad03c

Corrected and updated graphic 13 November 2017.

Troll Armies – from Israel to Media Matters to the Sayonim

In my speculative view based on my direct experience, the Zionists have perfected the use of human trolls and automated bots; one overtly active Mossad collaborator can inspire a crowd-stalking campaign that mobilizes over 400 distinctly identifiable trolls and bots (my best guess is one third human, two thirds artificial). While I have no direct knowledge, my understanding from secondary sources is that there is a clear division of labor between Israeli Army reservists based in Israel, the primary Zionist agents in the USA, not only the ADL but also its parent organization AIPAC, and specific sympathetic organizations such as Media Matters, whose “troll army” has been widely publicized.

Then there are the sayonim. These are volunteers who buy the Zionist “party line” and dedicate themselves to destroying anyone they see as an “enemy” of the Zionists. I have dealt personally with many such individuals who have emailed me, and it is with great sadness that I report my impression that these people, while well-intentioned, are out of touch with reality and often poorly educated.

Below is a partial listing of specific trolls for whom I have in hand copies of defamatory statements suitable for submission to a Court, for YouTube only. I have another list and copies of defamatory statements for Facebook. Every single one of these individuals is discoverable in true name via legal discovery, and can be held to account as a crowd-stalker and co-conspirator.

specific trolls 42c46

In my direct personal experience, these troll armies are very capable at persistent pervasive crowd-stalking. Every YouTube channel I have appeared on has been attacked (not just current, but past), to the point that most of my hosts have been forced to disable all comments, depriving the honest viewers of the interaction that I take pains to provide when not being crowd-stalked. Many hosts have not invited me to return, perhaps influenced by the demonetization (“shadow-banning”) of any interview with me rather than the substance of my work that led to my being recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize in January 2017. [30]

These crowd-stalkers have also, on occasion, succeeded in getting videos deleted by marshalling multiple reports of “bullying” which is patently absurd in my case, but effective when YouTube is lazy (or complicit). Here is one case of a perfectly reasonable interview deleted by YouTube – there are others.

Steele, Robert, with Kenneth Ameduri, “Another False Flag? What Evidence Shows Us About The Las Vegas Shooting,” Crush the Street (Audio, 30:57), October 17, 2017.

In my direct personal experience, these crowd-stalkers are skilled at destroying fund-raising campaigns, to include pursuing all 1,500 Facebook shares (in the case of the #UNRIG IndieGoGo-Generosity campaign) such that a campaign raising $29,237.44 the month prior to the crowd-stalking, can quickly be brought down to $8,054.14, then $4,733.41, then $1,200 or so in two subsequent earnings. The most recent was $542.51.

In my direct personal experience, these crowd-stalkers engage in campaigns of defamation intended to make their target destitute. Apart from alienating all possible donors, funding channels such as IndieGoGo and PayPal appear to receive hundreds of emails claiming that a particular individual, organization, or campaign is a scam or a fraud. To their great credit, both IndieGoGo and PayPal have proven to be steady level-headed organizations able to discern such obvious defamation endeavors in my specific case, but I am troubled by some instances where they have closed accounts on the basis of what appear to me to both illegal and often capricious discriminatory actions.

In my direct personal experience, these crowd-stalkers do not read. They worship at the altar of video and social media blurbs. They are so myopic that they are incapable of visiting my personal website where my life’s work is free online, including two books with Forewords by US Senators, and my recent recommendation for the Nobel Peace Prize. [31]

Media “Hit Jobs” On Demand

I appeared on Alex Jones’ InfoWars on 29 June 2017, speaking for two hours on the subject of pedophilia. [32] Few people know that I am both a Commissioner for the International Tribunal for International Justice (INTJ) [33] and its project on elite pedophilia led by Chief Justice Sir John Walsh of Brannaugh, and I am also nurturing a book by West Point graduate Joachim Hagopian, Pedophilia & Empire: Satan, Sodomy, and the Deep State. [34] My remarks clearly scared at least one major pedophile in the media world. On the very same day, Ben Collins at The Daily Beast published a story intended to discredit me, “NASA Denies That It’s Running a Child Slave Colony on Mars,” that was quickly repeated by Peter Holley of The Washington Post and then a number of other international outlets. [35] This stuff does not happen by accident. This was a hit job.

During a two-hour interview with Alex Jones, I spoke in depth about pedophilia and the fatal exploitation of children (on Earth), including their murder and the harvesting of their blood, body parts, and bone marrow. Only at the very end, in answer to a caller who in retrospect may have been setting me up, did I address children sent into space on “20 year and out missions” to leverage growth while in transit; and an existing colony on Mars, established fifteen years ago, with 10,000 people there now. [36]

The Daily Beast conflated these three completely separate factual concepts to discredit me. I believe that legal discovery will determine that Ben Collins was “fed” the conflated false story and lacked the integrity to refuse the lead. Who, exactly, put Ben Collins on to this story and authorized the follow on by The Washington Post is discoverable by due legal process. If I had to guess, I would look to Media Matters, which is led by an individual with some serious issues, and “ruthlessly targets conservatives.” [37]

This aspect of #GoogleGestapo represents the total complicity between the MSM and the new social media control network – the larger “system” is comprehensive and includes – in addition to the ability to marshal public communications including Hollywood movies – the ability to interfere with commercial contracts.

Meet-Up Pro Account Termination

In early July 2017, when Cynthia McKinney agreed to join me in leading #UNRIG, [38] a non-violent fact-based alternative to #RESIST, I committed to a $77,300 per year paid professional MeetUp network of 435 fully-integrated MeetUps (one for each Congressional District). At the same time I published the below concept graphic for billboards and bumper stickers.

concept graphic abaa8

Almost immediately (with notification to me on 14 July via email), the CEO of MeetUp, Scott Heiferman, appears to have personally ordered the cancellation of our 435 MeetUps, giving up $77,300 in revenue. This is the same CEO who is collaborating with the ADL to sponsor 1,087 #RESIST MeetUps for whom the fees have been waived – hence MeetUp appears to be providing an illegal, undeclared, in-kind donation to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) of over $195,000 dollars. The ADL is the co-sponsor of all 1,087 #RESIST MeetUps. I speculate – subject to legal discovery at the appropriate time and place – that the ADL directed Scott Heiferman to cancel our #UNRIG professional network. [39] This action was so outrageous it inspired the below cartoon by Robert Ocegueda.

unrig 3e722

I would not be at all surprised to learn that the ADL (or its higher master, AIPAC), provided $77,300 to Meet-Up as a covert substitute payment, and perhaps also paid the $195,000 in “waived” fees. All of this is discoverable by due process of law.

Denial of Service Attacks

When all else fails, do denial of service attacks. We have been shut down for as long as a week. Fortunately these brute force attacks – while demanding time and money to defeat – are moderately moronic. I have much more admiration for the manner in which the Zionists subvert otherwise well-intentioned institutions (including in my own experience, the various newspapers in the United Kingdom (UK) that very stupidly censor commentators reported by the Zionists to be spammers and haters, without bothering to actually read the content in question).

It has been amusing for me to trace some of these denial of service attacks to rogue elements of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as well as Delphi in Ashburn, Virginia. If and when a full legal discovery process can take place, specific chains of command can be identified.

X-Ratings Across Microsoft via Kaspersky

I don’t make this stuff up. A fan – we have millions of them – sent me the below graphic.

Kaspersky 6e1ce

Kaspersky is not stupid – they are just lazy, as are all others who rely on automated processes to filter out individuals and sites on the basis of what are largely false reports from Zionist trolls.

What the above really means is that the Zionists have successfully fooled Kaspersky – and perhaps Norton and others – into X-rating a non-profit educational website that sets the gold standard for truth in public service. This means that citizens in libraries, universities, and government agencies as well as corporations who have legitimate needs for access to truthful information are being blocked by Zionists who have mastered the art of censoring information critical of Zionist Israel or the larger Deep State.

As someone who has managed a false flag operation for the CIA, and who is a top published author on the topics of deep state, false flag operations, pedophilia, and fake news (and rarely but sometimes about the holocaust and Zionist subversion), I speculate that my non-profit educational website is triggering just about every flagword on the Deep State / Zionist watchlist – a watchlist that is “Top Secret” and not subject to any form of Congressional or judicial oversight. The First Amendment consequences are staggering, completely apart from a global conspiracy to commit tortuous interference against hundreds of thousands if not millions of individuals and organizations.

My Personal Conclusions

All Paths Lead to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) appears to be the Zionist social media spy service and enforcer. [40] In the early years of social media, the ADL and the Zionist Information Operations (IO) units – generally reservists is Israel – appear to have perfected the art of digital assassination. Anyone critical of Israel and Zionist atrocities (such as the genociding of the Palestinians) or calling for the boycott of Israel in social media was immediately “reported” by no fewer than twelve Zionist trolls as being a spammer, a hater, or – as has been used to successfully cause the deletion of three interviews of me at YouTube [41] – a “bully.” They seem to have perfected the art of gaming the system – from Kaspersky to Rolling Stone to Slate to Mother Jones and all other sites, the “system” is on automatic pilot and anytime twelve or more “reports” come in, they are assumed to be authentic and the person being reported is automatically assassinated – banned, blocked, deleted or in the case of Kaspersky, “X-Rated.” I experienced this personally and found that none of the organizations where this process works to the Zionists’ complete satisfaction are competent at detecting and neutralizing digital assassination – nor do they care – they are part of the system, with malice aforethought.

#GoogleGestapo: A Work in Progress

Eric Schmidt was hired by Larry Page and Sergei Brin to build Google after they stole Yahoo’s search engine, [42] received funding from Dr. Rick Steinheiser in CIA’s Office of Research and Development (ORD), [43] and picked up the best and the brightest from Alta Vista that was suffering under Hewlett Packard (HP) dysfunctionality. [44] It was probably Schmidt that master-minded the illegal, undeclared in-kind contributions from Google to the Hillary Clinton campaign, manipulating search results so that “Hillary + Crime” become just Hillary, and “Trump” became Trump plus Hitler. [45] Schmidt went on to create a virtual Censorship Board that included Facebook and Twitter and others, and began actively manipulating, across all social media, not just searches, but polls and trending. Most recently Twitter has admitted that in the weeks leading up to Election Day it repressed substantial numbers of tweets critical of Hillary Clinton or referring to alleged pedophile John Podesta’s emails. [46] Today I see the Censorship Board actively demonetizing, [47] censoring, and assassinating – digitally assassinating – anyone who they judge to be a source of “fake news” which is to say, any source that disputes the MSM and USG narratives that are so obviously false themselves.

I have learned recently that Eric Schmidt is so proud of his Censorship Board [48] and his ability to control, censor, and manipulate social media, that he has offered this system to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) – Communist China. Imagine the irony. Made in the USA by Zionists, totally satisfactory to Communist China. [49]

I must also observe that Google appears to have become an alternative to the CIA, a full-fledged covert operations organization where Zionist Jared Cohen is totally enamored of regime change operations and the digital assassination of dissidents [50] in every dictatorship the USA loves (which is to say, all of them less North Korea and Cuba), [51] and the active manipulation of information to serve his Deep State masters including the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) – the same organization that has recommended that US citizen dissidents be treated as “domestic terrorists.” [52]

The Zionist Double-Standard

What is quite clear to me is that no one is holding the Zionists (or other elements of the Deep State) accountable. For all of the misplaced focus on Russian efforts to “hack” the election – a pack of lies that I and others have compellingly challenged [53] – no one has raised the obvious point that the pernicious influence of Israel is everywhere and the Zionist attacks on all of us are carried out with impunity.

A double-standard appears to exist. It is “okay” for Zionists to call for the assassination of Barack Obama, or Donald Trump, or Roger Stone on Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube, but it is not “okay” for Prager University, [54] to take the most important case of our time, to espouse conservative values consistent with the US Constitution and all that it represents; nor is it “okay” for me to question the official narrative despite my unique qualifications for doing so as a former spy who has managed a false flag and covert media influence operations, and is in passing the top Amazon reviewer for non-fiction who has also been recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Snap-Shot of the Zionist Attack Machine: Six Ways, Ninety Days

Using #UNRIG and myself as a case study, I speculate – subject to legal discovery – that I have seen #GoogleGestapo apply against #UNRIG, Earth Intelligence Network and me a total of six methods in ninety days (there may be more).

01 The ordering of a paid asset to begin a 90-day defamation campaign including many lies, mobilizing many others to do crowd-stalking and actively libel me, perhaps with some assurance of indemnity (coverage of the eventual award from a federal lawsuit).

02 The ordering of a Media Matters hit-job that reached over 25 million people

03 The ordering of Meet-Up to shut down a legitimate non-profit educational campaign, sacrificing $77,300 in revenue (perhaps paying the same amount covertly)

04 The mobilization of over 400 distinct trolls and bots to defame, slander, libel, and otherwise interfere with the legitimate election reform civics education campaign of my non-profit educational corporation, focused on censoring my public appearances and cutting off all donations.

05 The ordering of multiple denial of service attacks against my primary blog.

06 The mobilization of over 400 distinct trolls and bots to report as an X-rated website to be blocked across governments, corporations, libraries, and other institutions.

All of this is personal speculation pending a legal discovery process – I have written all of this down because I am worried that the emerging legal cases will be “gamed” through settlements that forego legal discovery documenting a much larger systemic conspiracy – a global racketeering network inimical to democracy, freedom, peace, and prosperity.


All of the social media enterprises appear to be vulnerable to a massive Title 7 discrimination lawsuit. I believe that Prager University is making a mistake in limiting its focus to YouTube, a Google surrogate, alone.

As my own experience suggests, there is a larger construct of control and I am quite certain that if Prager University and its superb legal team plan for a jury trial and discovery along the lines I have outlined above, they will find that this is a vaster conspiracy than they imagined (they are being attacked at multiple points, not just through the deletion of a few videos); that it has been deliberately constructed by Eric Schmidt and others serving Zion; and if they can legally discover and document this conspiracy in detail, then they are eligible for triple damages as well as a place of honor among those who defend the First Amendment specifically and the US Constitution generally.

The role of Alan Dershowitz within the Prager team is of some concern to me. Absent the lead lawyers understanding that he is an Israel Firster, it is possible they will allow him to gut their case down to a simple restoration of a few videos, rather than the systemic discovery of a conspiracy that must be exposed in detail, and eradicated, if we are to restore democracy and the rule of law in the USA while ending the scourge of predatory digital censorship and assassination world-wide.

There is a middle ground but I doubt that the social media mandarins are ready to consider the following accommodations to the public interest – if Alan Dershowitz can make this happen, he will have served us all very well and I will be the first to acknowledge his national service.

01 Restore all banned videos and posts going back in time except those that violate copyright or are defamatory – end false copyright strikes (e.g. against negative reviews) and end copyright extortion;

02 Establish a clear demonetization policy approved by advertisers and open to all for review;

03 Respect all providers of content without exception: create a 24/7 appeals process with real humans and maintain a publicly accessible list of every banned and demonetized video or post with a clear explanation of why it was banned or demonetized;

04 Respect all reports of defamation without exception: create a 24/7 delete and ban process with real humans and maintain a publicly accessible list of every instance of defamation that has been acted upon.

05 Require all subscribers to have one identity only; end trolls and end bots.

06 End the role of the ADL and others as preferred “fact-checkers” – reject Israel First and specifically protect all criticism of Israel and all calls for a boycott of Israel.

07 Agree that all Internet services providers are de facto public utilities and earnestly abide by Title 7.

All of this is my personal opinion, not a legal commentary. I believe we are beginning a 1,000 year cycle of peace and prosperity; #GoogleGestapo can reform itself, or it can be replaced. The collective is rising.

*(Image credit: Snapshout courtesy of The Alex Jones Channel/ YouTube)


[1] Sonam Sheth, “Roger Stone plans to sue Twitter for suspending his account,”, 29 October 2017.

[2] Editors, “‘I’m looking to sue’: Black activist says Twitter banned her as ‘Russian bot’,”, 26 October 2017.

[3] I founded #UNRIG and was pleased to have Dr. Cynthia McKinney agree to not only join the non-profit educational campaign, but assume total responsibility for the people side of the campaign – creating and nurturing civics “PowerCells” – while I pursue crypto solutions (Crypto-Value, Crypto-Voice, Crypto-Tools, and Crypto-Intelligence). Learn more at

[4] Jason Goodman, Patricia Negron, and “Queen Tut” now known to be Susan Lutzke, have been served. The original complaint, soon to be expanded and amended, can be seen at I will not litigate this case in social media or published articles – I trust the Court and Jury to render fair judgment on the basis of both my own evidence and evidence discovered through due process of the law.

[5] Prager University, “Prager University (PragerU) Takes Legal Action Against Google and YouTube for Discrimination,” Press Release, 24 October 2017. The Complaint for Damages, Injunctive Relief, and Declaratory Judgment demanding a Jury Trial was filed on 10/23 and served on 11/1. DOES 1-25 is probably an open-ended reference to 25 specific individuals to be identified as the case goes forward and discovery is undertaken. As of 5 November 21 of the banned videos are available for viewing via the following: Rachel del Guidice, “Watch the 21 PragerU Videos That YouTube Is Censoring,” The Daily Signal, 14 October 2016. The editors have been asked to update the post to include the 50+ banned videos as of today.

[6] Outrage is growing across the USA against the Zionists. From pedophilia to legislation that would make it felony to criticize Israel and call for a boycott of Israel, to the Las Vegas massacre and associated financial crimes, to the recent discovery that many state and local leaders are mandating that no one can receive disaster relief or even have a contract with their state or local government unless they swear to never boycott Israel, the Israel First versus America First confrontation has never been more obvious to so many.

[7] Arnold, Steve, “Revealing the Google Relevance Sins,” Beyond Search, 2 May 2017 and Arnold, Steve, “Google and Hate Speech: None of This I Know It When I See It,” Beyond Search, 7 June 2017. See also 21st Century Wire, “Google Is the Engine of Censorship,”, 11 August 2017; Andre Damon, “Google Turning into Censorship Engine,”, 5 August 2017 and Andre Damon, “Google’s chief search engineer legitimizes new censorship algorithm,” World Socialist Web Site, 31 July 2017; Susan Duclos, “Google-YouTube Goes Full Nazi Against Independent Media – Hiding ‘Controversial Content’ And ‘Redirecting’ Searches,”, 2 August 2017; Peter Hasson, “Anti-Corporate Voices On Both Right And Left Claim Google Censorship,” Daily Caller, 31 August 2017; David North, “An Open Letter to Google: Stop the Censorship of the Internet!, 25 August 2017; Michael Nunez, “Former Facebook Workers: We Routinely Suppressed Conservative News,” Gizmodo, 9 May 2016; Valentina Palladino, “YouTube clarifies “hate speech” definition and which videos won’t be monetized,”, 2 June 2017; Bethania Palma, “Facebook Introduces Measure to Block Advertisements From Sites That Share Fake News,”, 28 August 2017.

Robert Parry, “NYT Cheers the Rise of Censorship Algorithms,”, 2 May 2017 and my favorite, Whitney Webb, “YouTube Moves To Censor “Controversial” Content – Brings ADL On Board As Flagger,”, 7 August 2017.

[8] Related but far beyond the scope of this carefully focused work are Zionist controls over banking, entertainment, and media; Zionist use of “crypto-Jews” who over generations remain deeply devout but penetrate other religious hierarchies as well as institutions inherent hostile to Zionists; and inter-marriage to include very calculated targeting of brides from prominent non-Jewish families that comprise the non-Zionist “establishment.”

[9] As a spy I managed a false flag event for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) – no one died. Since leaving CIA and particularly since 9/11 I have published and spoken extensively on false flag events in which some people do die, and the budget-building nature of these events in which most domestic terrorists appear to be entrapment operations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Cf. Trevor Aaronson, The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terrorism (Ig Publishing, 2013). An excellent summary review of this book that studies 175 court cases across the USA can be read at Orange Alert!

[10] Thomas Dishaw, “Bookmark This: Over 400 Links Google Doesn’t Want You To Visit,” Government Slaves, 29 August 2017; Eric Sommer, “Google Censors Block Access to CounterPunch and Other Progressive Sites,” CounterPunch, 9 August 2017. The best over-all review is Robert Epstein, “The New Censorship: How did Google become the internet’s censor and master manipulator, blocking access to millions of websites?US News & World Report, 22 June 2016.

[11] David Byman, “Should We Treat Domestic Terrorists the Way We Treat ISIS? What Works—and What Doesn’t,” Foreign Affairs, 3 October 2017.

[12] Editors, “Facebook admits “oversight” after leak reveals internal research on vulnerable children,” CBS News, 1 May 2017; Editors, “Google Spying on Credit Card Spending to See if Ads Work Raises Privacy Concerns,”, 24 May 2017; Christopher Ketcham and Travis Kelly, “The Cloud Panopticon: Google, Cloud Computing and the Surveillance-Industrial-Complex,CounterPunch, 12 May 2017; John Naughton, “Google, not GCHQ, is the truly chilling spy network,” The Guardian, 18 June 2017.

[13] Christopher Ketcham and Travis Kelly, “The Cloud Panopticon: Google, Cloud Computing and the Surveillance-Industrial-Complex,” CounterPunch, 12 May 2017.  The following quotes are most helpful:

“’In legal terms, Google is in the Wild West,’ says Bankston. ‘The law hasn’t kept up.’

“But one of the big problems with the cloud, and the danger it presents, is that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against search and seizure do not apply. The caveats are buried deep in the text that users usually skip over, and click “I agree,” to install a new application. But the consequences are huge, says Bankston. ‘When private data is held by a third party like Google, the Supreme Court has ruled that you ‘assume the risk’ of disclosure of that data.’ When you store e-mail at Gmail – or, similarly, in the cloud at Yahoo or Hotmail – ‘you lose your constitutional protections immediately.’”

[14] Editors, “Alan Dershowitz,” Wikipedia, undated, accessed 3 November 2017.

[15] David Talbot, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America’s Secret Government (Harper Perennial, 2016). My summary review, which is “shadow-banned” by Amazon – itself part of the #GoogleGestapo system that censors with impunity – can be seen at 6-Star Reference for President Donald Trump — John Brennan Using Allen Dulles Playbook.

[16] Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, covers discriminatory practices and redress. While the language refers only to employees it appears to be applicable in practice to customers and the general public. One Department of Labor online notice entitled “Discrimination Is Against the Law,” undated, accessed 3 November 2017, says  this: “These types of discrimination are against the law[:] A program that is covered by one of the laws mentioned at the top of this poster is not allowed to discriminate on any of the following bases (types of discrimination): For customers, applicants, employees, and the general public: • race • color • national origin • religion• sex • age • disability • political affiliation or belief.” It is the latter – political affiliation or belief – that applies to Roger Stone, “Charlie Peach,” Prager University, and those of us who oppose the pernicious influence of Zionists within the USA. The matter of how “fake news” can be arbitrated and moderated, and who has the authority to censor anyone exercising their First Amendment rights including the right to put forward beliefs and opinions contrary to all evidence if evidence is considered, does not appear to be adequately addressed by existing law in as much as the US Constitution, as amended, has been thrown out by the Deep State and is not being respected – from power of the purse to the power to declare war, Congress appears to be in enemy hands. What we do know is that both the USG and MSM lie to the public (and to the Courts) on a regular basis, and it is most difficult for “Alternative Media” to get treated fairly by the social media counterparts – including fund-raising channels – to the MSM.

[17] Ryan Brim, “Steve Bannon Wants Facebook and Google Regulated Like Utilities,” The Intercept, 27 July 2017.

[18] Cf. Philip Ewing, “Tough Questions, Hours Of Hearings But No Silver Bullet On Russian Tech Interference,”, 2 November 2017. Both Congress and the social media enterprises continue to be hypocritical in pursuing the Russians as the primary offenders. The only person that hacked the US elections was Hillary Clinton, who stole 13 primary elections from Bernie Sanders (who knew it and went along) and was then blocked from doing the same thing to Donald Trump in the general election. Cf. Editors, “Graphic: How Hillary Clinton Stole the Democratic Nomination from Bernie Sanders — and Did Not Legally Win the Popular Vote,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 16 November 2017, with link to Axel Geijsel and Rodolfo Cortes Barragan, “Are we witnessing a dishonest election? A between state comparison based on the used voting procedures of the 2016 Democratic Party Primary for the Presidency of the United States of America,” White Paper, 7 June 2016 and other sources. My own two best analytic products are Steele, Robert. The Soft Coup Collapses – Blackmail Revealed – What Next?: CIA was bluffing, produced no evidence – Russians did not “hack” the election. Is this the beginning of the end of the Deep State in the USA? (Trump Revolution Series Book 6), Amazon Kindle, 7 January 2017 and Steele, Robert. Donald Trump, The Accidental President, Under Siege! (Trump Revolution Series Book 5), Amazon Kindle, 11 November, 2016. It is the Zionists – the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Awan Brothers case and of course Jeffrey Epstein’s covert operations – and our own CIA and FBI as well as National Security Agency (NSA) – that are spying on and blackmailing politicians, judges, celebrities, and selected bankers. These hearings are “fake news” and we can only hope that the Prager University case is not settled in a fake way – restoring 50+ videos and a quit claim when in fact the entire system could be exposed and dismantled.

[19] A really excellent contrast is provided by Michelle Malkin, “YouTube Banned Me, But Not the Hate Imams,”, 7 June 2017.

[20] Nafeez Ahmed, “How the CIA made Google: Inside the secret network behind mass surveillance, endless war, and Skynet—part 1,”, 22 January 2015; Deidre Fulton, “Revealed: CIA Funding Companies that Specialize in Social Media Spying,”, 15 April 2016.

[21] This work is not focusing on political enablers such as the “two-party tyranny” that legalizes high crimes by the Deep State, nor covert operations by elements of the USG. As unconstitutional as both of those may be, the primary focus here is on the private sector “system” known as #GoogleGestapo. On the two-party tyranny legalizing Deep State crime, see Matt Taibbi, Griftopia: A Story of Bankers, Politicians, and the Most Audacious Power Grab in American History (Spiegel & Grau, 2011) and Matt Taibbi, The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap (Spiegel & Grau, 2014). For an excellent article about covert government operations, using a British case, see Glenn Greenwald, “How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations,” The Intercept, 24 February 2014. I feel personally blessed to have always been supported by CIA in my post-government authorship, to include rapid approval of major books on intelligence reform by the Publications Review Board (PRB). I have the impression that most of the “dirty tricks” of this sort in the USA are based at Fort Meade and done by a mix of NSA contractors and US Army reservists. I do believe that CIA, the FBI, and NSA are actively spying on and blackmailing Members of Congress, but that is another story for another day.

[22] The Mossad was among the first of the national intelligence agencies to understand that software was the next frontier for spying.  From the mid-1980’s they excelled at both penetrating national, state, and local governments and law enforcement agencies with compromised software, and also overtly bidding for contracts to provide software and hardware services that enabled them to easily compromise the content of every client they served – the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the National Security Agency (NSA) are in my view totally compromised by the Zionists. A classic book on this subject is Martin Dillon and Gordon Thomas, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul (Carroll & Graf, 2002). My summary review, “shadow-banned” by Amazon, can be seen here: Riveting, Shocking, Eye-Opening, and Credible.

[23] Both of these are easily classified as unregistered agents of a foreign power but they have successfully avoided being held to account for failing to register, easily one of the reasons Israel supported the assassination of John F. Kennedy (the other was Kennedy’s insistence that CIA stop providing Israel with clandestine delivery of nuclear weapons components). Yitzhak  Rabin was in Dallas for the assassination and appears to have been Israel’s official representation to the assassination cabal led by Allen Dulles and protected by Lyndon Baines Johnson. See among multiple other sources Michael Collins Piper, “Israel’s Central Role in JFK Assassination,”, 1 August 2010; and Phil Giraldi, “Should AIPAC Register as a Foreign Agent?The American Conservative, 29 July 2017.

[24] In my direct experience, YouTube is “neutralizing” the subscription lists of leading Alternative Truth channels such as those of Jordan Sather and Sarah Westall, the latter a business professor. I know people who have had their MailChimp and other accounts arbitrarily suspended. This along with “shadow banning” through de-monetization are the primary “light” censorship protocols. There is some evidence Google and YouTube are rethinking their blatant censorship – videos of Cynthia McKinney that were once demonetized have suddenly been remonetized, and many of the interviews with me are being allowed to earn ad revenue. Some of the demonetization is very legitimate – advertisers have a right to appear only in relation to content they favor – but a legal discovery process will probably find that YouTube has been weaponized against both the left and the right.

[25] The single best summary I have found to date, including many case studies with links, is Maximillian Laumeister, “Google is Deleting Your Favorite YouTube Channels, And They Won’t Say Why,”, 12 May 2016.

[26] Jason Goodman, Patricia Negron, and George Webb with Robert Steele, “Robert David Steele,” Crowd Source the Truth (YouTube, 51:30), 13 June 2017.

[27] Mongoose, “AWANGATE – Joint CIA-Mossad Operations to Spy on US Congress? Debbie Wasserman Schultz Indictable? Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 28 August 2017.  As a former spy familiar with how our system works, I speculate that the CIA and perhaps the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have been complicit in both Mossad spying on Congress directly, and the use of Jeffrey Epstein to entrap politicians, judges, and others through the “Lolita Island” and “no-name hotel” pedophilia complex. Learn more at Epstein @ Phi Beta Iota.

[28] Adi Robertson, “Two months ago, the internet tried to banish Nazis. No one knows if it worked,” The Verge, 9 October 2017 has provided a superb overview of recent discrimination against the Alt-Right while failing to observe that Charlottesville was a contrived false flag event intended to make the Alt Right vulnerable. The article also provides a useful review of “Alt Tech” endeavors to create a post-Google Internet, with BitChute being notable as an alternative to YouTube. Several evaluations of Charlottesville are provided by Owl, “Charlottesville False Flag — Professional Hit, Paid Protesters? UPDATE 9 Jim Fetzer Outlines False Flag Anomalies,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 14 August 2017.

[29] #UNRIG: Summer of Peace, Generosity, from June 2017. Donations from those who wish to resist Zionist exploitation of US social media are especially invited.

[30] Jan Kalvik, “Intelligence & the Nobel Peace Prize,” Defence and Intelligence Norway, 6 February 2017; and Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize: Robert David Steele, undated, accessed 4 November 2017.


[32] Steele, Robert, with Alex Jones, “Alex Jones (FULL SHOW Commercial Free) Thursday 6/29/17: Today’s News, Robert David Steele #UNRIG,” InfoWars (YouTube, 3:01:12), June 29, 2017. Steele starts at 48:00. The ITNJ of which I am a Commissioner was so dismayed by the media hit job (next note) that they immediately published an extract from the two-hour interview to showcase the statements about pedophilia that appear to have frightened the pedophiles in positions of media power, Steele, Robert, with Alex Jones, “#UNRIG – Robert David Steele on the Alex Jones Show 6/29/17 – excerpts,” Committee to Support the International Tribunal, July 1, 2017.


[34] Joachim Hagopian, Pedophilia & Empire: Satan, Sodomy, and the Deep State (Joachim Hagopian, on-going 2017). My Foreword and the first nine chapters are both free online and available as Kindle Shorts for 99 cents each. Access both via “Joachim Hagopian: Pedophilia & Empire – Satan, Sodomy, & the Deep State UPDATE 10 Kindles Up,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 2 July 2017. A memorable short url is

[35] The two links below contain both a link to the original articles and my open letter to each author. “Ben Collins: NASA Denies It Kidnaps Children for 20-Year+ Missions to Mars UPDATE 1,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 1 July 2017; and “Robert Steele with Peter Holley: NASA, Kidnapped Children, Mars — Open Letter,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 3 July 2017.

[36] I was briefed on this personally by a retired PhD from NASA in July 2017, in the presence of other international figures, and I absolutely believe what I was told.

[37] Rachel Alexander, “Astroturf ‘Outrage Machine’ of Paid Trolls Floods Social Media to Counteract Negative News About Hillary Clinton,” The Stream, 9 October 2017. . In an earlier article the same author outlines Media Matters partners, “American Bridge 21st Century will provide research. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, is an ethics watchdog group similar to Judicial Watch. Shareblue is a social media firm.” Rachael Alexander, “LEAKED: Media Matters’ Secret Plan to Destroy Conservatives,” The Stream, 22 August 2017. See also Jerome R. Corsi, “Leaked Docs: David Brock Conspires with Facebook, Google to Shut Down Conservative Media,”, 9 February 2017. For a direct source, see Media Matters, “Donor Pitch,”, January 2017. Articles that focus on foreign troll armies, such as Leo Benedictus, “Invasion of the troll armies: from Russian Trump supporters to Turkish state stooges,” The Guardian, 6 November 2016, are very deliberately avoiding the “third rail” in banking, entertainment, government, and media: the Zionist “machine.”

[38] and also

[39] MeetUp @ Phi Beta Iota.

[40] The ADL is the front end for the B’Nai Brith, the oldest Jewish service organization in the world, established in 1843. According to Wikipedia, 95% of its membership is in the USA, leading me to speculate the various agents of Israel (a foreign power) see the USA as the single most important nation-state to be subverted, controlled, and exploited (e.g. by instigating wars that serve Israel on the basis of false flag operations and other lies).

[41] Steele, Robert, with Kenneth Ameduri, “Another False Flag? What Evidence Shows Us About The Las Vegas Shooting,” Crush the Street (Audio, 30:57), October 17, 2017; Steele, Robert, with Sarah Westfall, “Robert David Steele: Las Vegas Massacre False Flag Case Study,” Business Game Changers (You Tube, 54:48), October 7, 2017. New: BitChute to overcome #GoogleGestapo deletion by YouTube; Steele, Robert. “MGM Execs Made $190M On Insider Trading -Las Vegas Update,” Victurus Libertas, October 6, 2017. Note: new spreadsheet shows $297M in insider trading. YouTube (a Google surrogate) has restored the second reference two times now – there is clearly a business discussion going on within YouTube – the more they discriminate, the more people are moving to DTube, BitChute, Steemit and other alternatives. There is growing demand for a post-Google Internet that cannot be censored or manipulated.

[42] Saul Hansell, “TECHNOLOGY; Google and Yahoo Settle Dispute Over Search Patent,” New York Times, 10 August 2004.

[43] Supra Note 13, Ketcham and Kelly. This was announced at my Open Source Solutions Conference in 2006 by Stephen E. Arnold himself author of The Google Trilogy.

[44] As I recollect the situation from various conversations with others Alta Vista was a demo project for Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) which was acquired by Compaq and then Compaq was acquired by HP.  Neglected by HP and saddled with DEC “ovens” many but not all of the best and the brightest from Alta Vista quit and went to work for Google – these hires were the primary reason Google search worked as it did. Had HP understood the potential of Alta Vista, they would own it still today and Google would not exist – Alta Vista would be Google Plus.

[45] Jack Hadfield, “Report: Google Search Bias Protecting Hillary Clinton Confirmed in Experiment,”, 13 September 2016, and Robert Epstein, “Research Proves Google Manipulates Millions to Favor Clinton,”, 12 September 2016. By its very nature #GoogleGestapo is designed to produce refutations of such accusations, see for example Don Evon, “Collusion Confusion: A viral video accused the search engine of manipulating results in favor of Hillary Clinton,”, 10 June 2016, declaring this to be FALSE. Whom are we to believe? It is the absence of integrity across the system that needs to be addressed, the persistence and pervasiveness of #GoogleGestapo – and the Zionist’s exploitation of the system – are merely symptoms of the disease. A prolonged legal discovery process, perhaps led by a convergence of multiple lawsuits, could move beyond speculation and informed but unproven accusations, and actually document the inter-locking personalities, tools, and techniques used to achieve both deliberate and casual discrimination against individuals and organizations across the spectrum. New law is needed, starting with the determination that social media services are public utilities subject to the most rigorous enforcement of existing laws against discrimination.

[46] Jerome Corsi, “Twitter Admits to Blocking Anti-Hillary Tweets During 2016 Campaign,”, 2 November 2017; and Tyler Durden, “Twitter Admits It Buried “Podesta Email”, DNC Tweets Ahead Of The Presidential Election,”, 2 November 2017. And then there are those allegedly out-of-control employees: Lucas Tolan, “Disgruntled Twitter Employee Temporarily Deletes President Trump’s Personal Account,” Breitbart, 2 November 2017.

[47] The most famous and blatant case of demonetization was that of Alex Jones and InfoWars. AdSense, a Google surrogate, declared InfoWars a purveyor of “fake news” and deprived his organization of $3.5 million dollars in advertising earnings in relation to his coverage of the PizzaGate story based on John Podesta emails suggestive of a major pedophilia network involving both political and media personalities, one of whom is known to have been James Alefantis’ gay lover. The speed with which Alex Jones backed down on a perfectly legitimate story is suggestive of the coercive power of #GoogleGestapo. See Roberto Villalpando, “Infowars’ Alex Jones apologizes for spreading fake ‘Pizzagate’ story,” Austin American-Statesman, 26 March 2017. I reject the notion that PizzaGate was fake news – the panic that it inspired among the elite – many of them pedophiles – is sufficient to suggest that this was close to the mark. PizzaGate played a major role in opening the public mind to the reality that pedophilia is “the last veil” that once removed, will destroy the 1%.  PizzaGate was also the first major test of the Internet as a battleground between citizen investigators and #GoogleGestapo. Cf. Jasun Horsley, “David Brock, Invasion 4Chan, the Alt-Right, & Pizzagate,” Auticulture, 4 December 2016.

“David Brock and Correct the Record played a central role in a massive and long-term covert campaign of perception management that spans both Republican and Democratic parties. It involves the “infiltration” of 4chan and the illegitimate use of more mainstream social networking sites (reddit, twitter) in order to redirect and undermine public political debate, polarize opinion, and help “populate and co-opt” an alt-“Alt-right” movement to be associated with racism, misogyny, fascism, anti-Semitism, conspiracy theories, and ‘fake news.’ Many of the agendas, and even players, involved in this can now be seen to congregate in or around the viral memeplex known as Pizzagate.’”

[48] Poynter’s International “fact-checking network” includes Snopes,, ABC News, and Politifact, but behind the scenes the primary “aggressive” fact-checker is the ADL. Its funders are the enemies of democracy, including the Gates Foundation, Google, the Omidyar Network, and the Open Source Foundation (OSF).

[49] #GoogleGestapo @ Phi Beta Iota.

[50] Julian Assange, “Google Is Not What It Seems,”, 2014. The below is a quote from Assange:

“Cohen’s directorate appeared to cross over from public relations and “corporate responsibility” work into active corporate intervention in foreign affairs at a level that is normally reserved for states. Jared Cohen could be wryly named Google’s ‘director of regime change.’”

[51] (Ambassador) Mark Palmer, Breaking the Real Axis of Evil: How to Oust the World’s Last Dictators by 2025 (Rowman & Littlefield, 2003). My summary review can be read at Single Most Important Work of the Century for American Moral Diplomacy.

[52] Supra Note 11, David Byman.

[53] Supra Note 18, Soft Coup. The CIA report, on page A-13, actually states in black and white that its findings are not based on evidence. See also many posts with linked sources under Russians @ Phi Beta Iota.

[54] Prager University, “Prager University (PragerU) Takes Legal Action Against Google and YouTube for Discrimination,” Press Release, 24 October 2017.


Recommended For You

Why Are UK Zionists Reluctant to Admit that the Israel Lobby Works in Britain?

“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone” – is an exhortation that may be applied not just to individuals and groups of peopl…

By David Macilwain

Building Unity to Oppose Zionism Hegemonic Pull - Iran Rises a New Pan-Islamic Power

  It’s official America’s star is waning … so much so in fact that its closest allies have caught on to it. Needless to say that the…

By Catherine Shakdam

I Am Miko Peled, And I Support Jeremy Corbyn

  Jeremy Corbyn is arguably not only one of the most popular leaders in the West today, he is also the most promising to those who care fo…

By Miko Peled

Balfour 100: Celebrating 100 Years of Injustice and Oppression

  On 7 November, in London’s famous Royal Albert Hall, there’s to be “a unique event drawing Christians and Jews together in celebration o…

By Stuart Littlewood

Boycott Marriott Hotels

Dec 7, 2017

I do hereby issue a call to the Sedona community and the entire state of Arizona to BOYCOTT the Marriott chain of hotels.  This hotel is engaged in racist, bigoted, biased and highly discriminatory employment hiring practices.  To deny employment to any person due to hair and/or beard length is to judge an individual on physical appearance alone- which says absolutely nothing about one’s ability to perform any specific job within this or any other company or business.   What’s next? Are we going to deny employment to women based on their breast size? When does the insanity ever end? This kind of bigoted, racist, discrimination belongs in the dust bin of human history and has NO PLACE in today’s highly diverse and multicultural society.

There was once a time when women were denied the right to vote and were considered 2nd class citizens. That madness has, fortunately, been largely overcome.  There was once a time when African Americans, Latinos and Native Americans were purposely discriminated against  because of their language, culture and/or skin color.  That madness has been largely overcome, although much more work needs to be done inthe area of race relations still in America.

Thus said, its time to craft local, state and federal law and legistlation to outlaw the discrimination of any American citizen due simply to physical appearance.  Sedona and the entire business community in the state of Arizona needs to EVOLVE in consciousness and intelligence and LEARN to accept citizens as they are and not what they want them to be.

Today, we live in a highly diverse and multicultural society.  No-one should be discriminated against because of their culture, religious affiliation, hair/beard length, breast size, disability, skin color, political affiliation, language or economic status.  Racism, bigotry and discrimination of any American citizen in our state needs to be criminalized and outlawed, permanently.  Its high time to bring equality and a level playing field to ALL members of our community in our great state.  Everyone is entitled to a decent standard of living, gainful employment and economic advancement irregardless of their physical appearance.  We must learn to embrace and celebrate our diversity and uniqueness in society- for this is what makes us a strong and free people.

Until hotel chains like Marriott (and others) learn to accept and embrace our wonderful diversity here in Sedona, in Arizona and in America at large, there is, unfortunately, no other option than to BOYCOTT their hotels and deny them business.  Hotel chains like Marriott need to learn to get in line with the highest values and aspirations of our wonderfully unique multicultural society here in America.  If they refuse to comply, then its time to remove them from our community.  Boycotting their businesses is one of the most effective ways of ending their racist, bigoted, discriminatory hiring and employment practices.  (It seems they have no problem, though, hiring right wing, red-neck, devil/death skull tatooed, ear and nose pierced, north korean style crew-cut donning recruits out of the #1 Terrorist institution on Earth: the US Military).  Business communities in every town, city, municipality and county in Arizona can, instead, bring in and approve of businesses that respect and uphold citizens rights to be free of any form of physical, cultural and/or religious discrimination.  This is the power that WE THE PEOPLE have to change and evolve our society for the better.

Irregardless, I stand persecuted and discriminated against (because of my beard and hair length) with this man and his associates- who, if he entered and preached in most of today’s churches in America, would be arrested, prosecuted and incarcerated for simply stating that we are to love our Creator and love one another (as he loved us):

(note the long hair and beard)

Till Judgement Day, I remain,

JTP, Sedona, Arizona, USA


CC: Arizona local, state and federal officials, administrators, agencies and media affiliates.



Time to TERMINATE the California Fascist Police State


Hillary Rodham Clinton is the real president of the united states

nov 12, 2016
“if we do not change our direction, we are likely to end up exactly
where we are headed”  – chinese proverb
hillary rodham clinton is the real president of the united states.
she won the popular vote, much like al gore did back in the 2000
election.  in most nations throughout the world, winning the popular vote
automatically makes one the victor in any general election.
the us presidential election has been stolen.
as the presidency of al gore was stolen back in 2000,
so now too has the presidency of hillary clinton been stolen
from the american people again.
by its very nature, the current “delegate”
system of independently appointing presidents
is a deliberate theft of the vote of the american people.
president elect hillary rodham clinton needs to walk
into the white house escorted by all 5 branches
of the us military and proclaim her victory as the
true and duely elected president of the united states of america.
steven craig jones
santa cruz, califirnia

More Than 100 Million Trees Have Died in California’s Drought

More Than 100 Million Trees Have Died in California’s Drought

California’s six years of drought[3] has left 102 million dead trees across 7.7 million acres of forest in its wake, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) announced[4] following an aerial survey. If that is not horrendous enough, 62 million trees died in the year 2016 alone—an increase of more than 100 percent compared to 2015.

In the photo below, all the dead trees are grey or orange.

Dead and dying trees on forest lands in California, August 2016. USFS Region 5 Flickr [5]

“The scale of die-off in California is unprecedented in our modern history,” Randy Moore, a forester for the U.S. Forest Service, told the Los Angeles Times[6], adding that trees are dying “at a rate much quicker than we thought.”

“You look across the hillside on a side of the road, and you see a vast landscape of dead trees,” added Adrian Das, a U.S. Geological Survey ecologist whose office is located in Sequoia National Park. “It’s pretty startling.”

Most of the dead trees are located in 10 counties in the southern and central Sierra Nevada region.

“Five consecutive years of severe drought in California, a dramatic rise in bark beetle infestation and warmer temperatures are leading to these historic levels of tree die-off,” the USFS said.

Forest Service experts believe that more trees will die in the coming months and years due to root diseases, bark beetle activity or other stress agents. The agency warned that tree deaths are on the rise in northern regions, especially in Siskiyou, Modoc, Plumas and Lassen counties.

The lack of rain and unseasonably high temperatures has added stress to the trees. These factors have made trees increasingly vulnerable[7] to bark beetles infestations and disease.

Some have raised concerns that the staggering number of dead trees can fuel even bigger and more destructive wildfires[8] in the Golden State.

Agriculture Sec. Tom Vilsack lamented that not enough resources are being invested into forest health and restoration.

“These dead and dying trees continue to elevate the risk of wildfire, complicate our efforts to respond safely and effectively to fires when they do occur, and pose a host of threats to life and property across California,” Vilsack said in a statement.

Not only that, researchers from the University of Washington found[9] that large forest die-offs—from drought, heat, beetle infestations or deforestation—can significantly impact global climate[10] patterns and alter vegetation on the other side of the world. The study was published this month in PLOS ONE.

“When trees die in one place, it can be good or bad for plants elsewhere, because it causes changes in one place that can ricochet to shift climate in another place,” said lead author Elizabeth Garcia. “The atmosphere provides the connection.”

In October 2015, California Gov. Jerry Brown declared the state’s unprecedented tree die-off a state of emergency. He formed a Tree Mortality Task Force to help mobilize additional resources for the safe removal of dead and dying trees.

However, some experts have suggested leaving the dead trees in the forests. Douglas Bevington, the forest program director for Environment Now[11]wrote[12] that dead trees are vital to forest ecosystems.

“Dead trees can remain standing for decades or more and a standing dead tree—known as a ‘snag’—provides great habitat for wildlife. Birds and mammals make their homes in openings carved within snags, while wood-boring insects that feed on snags provide the foundation of the food chain for a larger web of forest life, akin to plankton in the ocean,” he wrote.

“From the perspective of the timber industry, a snag in the forest is a waste, so timber companies and the Forest Service have spent decades cutting down snags as quickly as possible,” Bevington continued. “As a result, there is now a significant lack of snags in our forests and this shortage is harming woodpeckers, owls and other forest wildlife. For them, the recent pulse of snag creation is good news.”

Lorraine Chow is a freelance writer and reporter based in South Carolina.






What is the Calexit referendum?………………………………………….03
The case for independence in 9 simple points……………………..06
Is an independence referendum even legal?………………………..10
What are the overlying principles?……………………………………….11
What type of government will we have?………………………………..13
How will this impact our economy?………………………………………14
How will this impact our budget?………………………………………….16
What about all the debt we have?………………………………………..18
Will we have our own currency?…………………………………………..20
What about Medicaid?…………………………………………………………20
What about Medicare and Social Security?…………………………..21
What about our water and agriculture?………………………………..22
What about money for roads and highways?………………………..25
What about funding for education, Pell Grants, etc.?…………….26
How will we defend ourselves?…………………………………………….27
Will we join the United Nations?…………………………………………..28
Will we join the International Criminal Court?……………………….28
Will we be a member of the Group of Eight (G8)?………………….28
What about other intergovernmental organizations?…………….29
Will we have our own Olympic team?……………………………………29
Will I need a passport or a visa to visit the United States?…….30
What about embassies and consulates?………………………………31
Summary of points……………………………………………………………..32
In the Spring of 2019, Californians will go to the polls in a historic vote to
decide by referendum if California should exit the Union, a #Calexit vote.
You will have this historic opportunity because the Yes California
Independence Campaign will qualify a citizen’s initiative for the 2018 ballot
that if passed would call for a special election for Californians to vote for or
against the independence of California from the United States.
This is a very important question. It is the responsibility of this campaign to
explain what a yes vote will mean for you, your family, your community, our
state, our country, and our world. We have designed this booklet to answer
many of these questions and look to you to ask more.
As the sixth largest economy in the world, California is more
economically powerful than France and has a population
larger than Poland. Point by point, California compares and
competes with countries, not just the 49 other states.”
In our view, the United States of America represents so many things that
conflict with Californian values, and our continued statehood means
California will continue subsidizing the other states to our own detriment,
and to the detriment of our children.
Although charity is part of our culture, when you consider that California’s
infrastructure is falling apart, our public schools are ranked among the worst
in the entire country, we have the highest number of homeless persons
living without shelter and other basic necessities, poverty rates remain high,
income inequality continues to expand, and we must often borrow money
from the future to provide services for today, now is not the time for charity.
However, this independence referendum is about more than California
subsidizing other states of this country. It is about the right to selfdetermination
and the concept of voluntary association, both of which are
supported by constitutional and international law.
It is about California taking its place in the world, standing as an equal
among nations. We believe in two fundamental truths: (1) California exerts a
positive influence on the rest of the world, and (2) California could do more
good as an independent country than it is able to do as a just a U.S. state.
In 2016, the United Kingdom voted to leave the international community
with their “Brexit” vote. Our “Calexit” referendum is about California joining
the international community. You have a big decision to make.
Being a U.S. state is no longer serving California’s best interests. On issues
ranging from peace and security to natural resources and the environment,
it has become increasingly true that California would be better off as an
independent country. Here’s a summary of why we think so.
The U.S. Government spends more on its military than the next several
countries combined. Not only is California forced to subsidize this massive
military budget with our taxes, but Californians are sent off to fight in wars
that often do more to perpetuate terrorism than to abate it. The only reason
terrorists might want to attack us is because we are part of the United
States and are guilty by association. Not being a part of that country will
make California a less likely target of retaliation by its enemies.
California’s electoral votes haven’t affected a presidential election since
1876. On top of that, presidential election results are often known before
our votes are even counted. So, why should we keep subjecting ourselves
to presidents we play no role in electing, to 382 representatives and 98
senators we can’t vote for, and all the government officials and federal
judges appointed by those very same people we don’t elect.
The U.S. Government maintains a burdensome trade system that hurts
California’s economy by making trade more difficult and more expensive
for California’s businesses. As long as California remains within this
burdensome trade system, we will never be able to capitalize on the
trade and investment opportunities that would be available to us as an
independent country. On top of that, the United States is dragging California
into the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement which conflicts with our values.
Since 1987, California has been subsidizing the other states at a loss of
tens and sometimes hundreds of billions of dollars in a single fiscal year.
As a result, we are often forced to raise taxes and charge fees in California,
and borrow money from the future to make up the difference. This is partly
why California presently has some of the highest taxes in the country, and
so much debt. Independence means that all of our taxes will be kept in
California based on the priorities we set, and we will be able to do so while
repaying our debts and phasing out the current state income tax.
California is the most diverse state in the United States and that is
something we are proud of. This diversity is a central part of our culture
and an indispensable part of our economy. As a U.S. state, our immigration
system was largely designed by the 49 other states thirty years ago.
This immigration system has since neglected the needs of the California
economy and has hurt too many California families. Independence means
California will be able to decide what immigration policies make sense for
our diverse and unique population, culture, and economy, and that we’ll be
able to build an immigration system that is consistent with our values.
Certain minerals and other natural resources like coal, oil, and natural gas
are being extracted from California at below market value rates by private
corporations with the permission of the U.S. Government. While a small
portion of the revenue is shared with us, our share has been withheld during
times of sequestration. That means the U.S. Government is paying their
debts with royalties collected from selling off California’s natural resources.
Independence means we will gain control of the 46% of California that is
currently owned by the U.S. Government and its agencies. We will therefore
take control of our natural resources and be the sole beneficiary of royalties
collected if and when they are extracted from our lands.
California is a global leader on environmental issues. However, as long
as the other states continue debating whether or not climate change is
real, they will continue holding up real efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
The truth is this country accounts for less than five percent of the world’s
population yet consumes one-third of the world’s paper, a quarter of the
world’s oil, 27 percent of the aluminum, 23 percent of the coal, and 19
percent of the copper. Independence means California will be able to
negotiate treaties to not only reduce the human impact on our climate but
also to help build global resource sustainability.
The Affordable Care Act was enacted by the U.S. Government to lower the
cost of health care and expand health insurance coverage to the uninsured,
yet millions of Californians still lack access to quality health care because
they can’t afford it. For many, access to hospitals and medicine is a life or
death issue. Independence means we can fund the health care programs we
want and ensure everyone has access to the medicines they need because
our taxes will no longer be subsidizing other states. Finally, California can
join the rest of the industrialized world in guaranteeing health care as a
universal right for all of our people.
California has some of the best universities but in various ways, our schools
are among the worst in the country. Not only does this deprive our children
of the education they deserve, but it also costs taxpayers billions in social
services and law enforcement expenses linked to lacking opportunities
resulting from poor education. Independence means we will be able to fully
fund public education, rebuild and modernize public schools, and pay public
school teachers the salaries they deserve. On top of that, independence
means freedom from federal education policies and one-size-fits-all
standards set by political appointees on the other side of the continent.
The Constitution says that each state in the Union shall retain every
power which is not by the Constitution given to the federal government.
The Constitution does not give the power of secession to the federal
government, nor does it expressly prohibit the states from exercising this
power. Therefore, the power of secession is reserved to the states, or to the
people, per the Tenth Amendment.
Further, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution says that treaties ratified
by Congress are the supreme law of the land. In 1945, the United States
ratified the UN Charter, a treaty that guarantees peoples the right to selfdetermination
in Article I. Thus, by ratifying this treaty, the United States
adopted the right of self-determination as the supreme law of our land.
Lastly, Aristotle wrote that the state “is a culmination of widening circles of
human association based on human wants,” and that it is “the highest form
of human association.” Why is this important?
It is important because in 1948, the United Nations adopted its Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. Article 20 of that Declaration provides that
“No one may be compelled to belong to an association.” This campaign
takes the position, as Aristotle argued, that the state is an association and
therefore we Californians may not be compelled to belong to the State, or
the country, that is the United States of America.
Regardless, if the original 13 American colonies didn’t pursue their
independence from the British Empire because King George and the
government in London said they had no right to do so, then this country
wouldn’t exist today. Therefore, when a government says to its people that
they have no right to seek their independence, history shows us that has not
deterred the cause of freedom or self-determination.
Most of the time, California doesn’t get the national government we choose.
We have voted for a Democratic majority in both chambers of the California
Legislature since 1971 and have elected Democrats to the U.S. Senate since
1992. Clearly California leans left but by the time of the 2016 election we
will have had a Republican-controlled House for 19 out of the last 24 years
and a Republican-controlled Senate for 15 out of the last 24 years.
Whether you support the Democrats or the Republicans, this system denies
us the national government we vote for. The simple truth is that 88% of the
U.S. population is not from California, and that means in practice all these
non-Californians decide what national government California gets.
Most of the time (roughly six years in every 10, for the last three decades
dating back to the mid-1980s) that has been a government Californians
rejected at the ballot box. We believe California should be a country, so that
we can get the national government we vote for every time – not just when it
happens to coincide with what 49 other states want.
When we don’t get the Senate we vote for, it doesn’t just impact the laws
they enact that we must then adhere to, or the budget they pass that we
must then live with. It also affects which judicial nominees are confirmed to
the bench with the power to declare California’s laws unconstitutional. This
happens more than you think and although we maintain the right to appeal
to a higher court, the Supreme Court reverses more decisions from the 9th
Circuit Court based in San Francisco than any other Circuit Court system
in the country. In 2010, the American Bar Association gave California’s
9th Circuit Court the lowest grade of all “numbered” Circuit Courts with a
C- average, pointing out that some 80% of its decisions were reversed or
vacated by the Supreme Court.
Independence isn’t about policies or parties. Those are questions which will
be decided at future elections, not by this independence referendum. All you
have to decide is who should choose the future governments Californians
live under: the people of California, or the people of the 49 other states?
Q: “But won’t we be abandoning the US to permanent right-wing control?”
A: No. Without California, every single president elected since 1880 would still
have been elected, and even though there have been 84 Congressional elections
since California became a state in 1850, the balance of power in the House of
Representatives and the Senate would have only been different three and four
times, respectively. And remember, California already does not get to vote for
382 of the 435 members of the House or for 98 of the 100 members of the
Senate so our impact on the composition of the House and Senate is very minimal
regardless of our economic strength and population.
On top of that, the US is a center-right country. A recent Gallup poll showed
that just 21% of Americans identify as liberal – and that’s with California in the
equation. Conservatives are the largest ideological group, at 38% nationwide.
So an argument could be made that we wouldn’t be abandoning the rest of the
US to right-wing governments, we would be making it easier for them to have the
governments they want, too. A win-win!
When California becomes an independent country, or perhaps during the
process of becoming an independent country, the people of California will
choose the type of government system we want to have. Will we have a
democratic-republic like the United States with a president and a bicameral
legislature, or will we establish for ourselves a parliamentary republic with
a prime minister and a parliament? Possibly, with all our ingenuity and
imagination, we can craft an entirely unique system of governance.
However, these are questions to be decided by future elections, not by
this independence referendum. While it is a very important question, this
referendum is only asking whether or not you think California should become
an independent country. It does not declare California’s independence from
the United States, nor does it establish any new system of government. It
does not remove any elected official from office, nor does it take away your
U.S. citizenship. In short, the referendum is a way to gauge the sense of the
people on whether we Californians prefer the status quo of statehood, or if
we want to see a change towards nationhood.
Voting yes on the referendum is essentially voting yes to reform our system
of government as well as our political and elections process to:
• guarantee a more responsible and responsive government;
• move away from a two-party system;
• reduce the influence of big money in elections;
• restore the principle of one person, one vote;
• establish a system of proportional representation; and,
• engage disenfranchised voters
These are goals Californians and others are currently fighting for, yet under
the corrupt U.S. political system, they are unlikely to be achieved.
The economy is such an important part of this debate. The choices that the
country of California makes, and whether those choices will be easier or
harder than those faced by the state of California, will greatly depend upon
how much money is available.
For that reason, the United States Government and California’s critics
desperately want you to believe that California would be poorer as an
independent country, be greater in debt, and that it would therefore have to
raise taxes even more to make ends meet.
But that simply isn’t true. In fact, it’s not even close – California is a donor
state which means that we have been subsidizing many of the other states
with our federal taxes. This has been happening for decades now and we
lose generally tens and sometimes hundreds of billions of dollars in a single
year because of this.
For example, the Federal Government’s own figures show in 2014, the last
year for which data is available, that Californians collectively paid $369.2
billion in federal taxes and received federal payouts totaling approximately
$355.8 billion. That’s a loss of more than $13.5 billion in a year when
California was still working its way out of the recession.
Since 1995, California has lost about $16 billion each year. To put that in
perspective, California’s entire state budget in 2014 was $156 billion. So
when we talk about how much money is available in our budget, California as
an independent country would have about 10% more without any additional
taxes and before adjusting our budget priorities.
By keeping all the taxes you pay in California, we will be on our way to budget
surpluses instead of deficits. By remaining part of the United States, not only
will the 49 other states ensure that we keep subsidizing them but California
will always be in debt, will always be forced to borrow money that puts us
deeper into debt, and will always have a massive national debt hanging over
our heads. Today that national debt is over $19 trillion.
In short, we pay the highest taxes, we have been subsidizing the other states
at an average loss of about $16 billion a year since 1995, and California is
hundreds of billions of dollars in debt. Had California been an independent
country since the 1980s when we started subsidizing other states, we
would have had $120 billion more available to us since that time and would
not have had to accumulate so much debt, or raise taxes so much. So the
question you have to decide is who should receive the taxes Californians pay
every year: the people of California, or the people of the 49 other states?
QUESTION ? Q: “But isn’t the US government spending more per person in California?”
A: No. In FY 2015 federal spending in California was $6,452 per person, lower
than the national average of $6,649. That may not seem like a lot but there’s
more than 39 million people in California. It’s been worse. For example, federal
spending in California per person was $800 below the national average in FY
2014 and $994 below the national average in FY 2013.
Q: “But what about US government spending as a percent of California’s GDP?”
A: The State of California actually researched this in 2015. They found that
federal funding is equivalent to less than 16 percent of California’s statewide
economic activity, which is lower than the national average of 19 percent.
Mentioning California’s GDP brings up another important point, though: Did you
know California’s economy is now the 6th largest in the world? California is more
economically-powerful than France.
Independence will stop the United States from using our taxes to subsidize
other states. However, returning California’s taxes to California’s budget
represents only a portion of the fiscal benefit of independence.
When California is an independent country, every dollar in federal taxes you
pay will be sent to Sacramento instead of to the U.S. Government. This will
not only keep your taxes in California, but it will also dramatically increase
the size of California’s budget by hundreds of billions of dollars.
As independent country, however, California will assume much more
responsibility and therefore have a range of budget items from Social
Security to national security that we will be responsible to fund with that
budget each year. This is where a substantial fiscal opportunity arises for
us to align our budget priorities with our values as Californians, and thereby
secure the funds we need to invest in the healthcare, education, and
infrastructure programs we can afford only through independence.
Take national security for example. In 2015, the U.S. Government dedicated
more than half of all discretionary spending on its military. In dollars, that
means they spent nearly $600 billion on its military that year, about 16%
of the entire $3.8 trillion national budget, and over three percent of the
nation’s Gross Domestic Product.
If California as an independent country spent 16% of its annual budget, or
over three percent of our Gross Domestic Product on military defense, not
only would that conflict with our values as peace-loving Californians, and not
only would it be a massive waste of tax dollars, but it would frankly render
this campaign largely unnecessary and even unworkable.
One of the benefits of independence is the ability to spend less on weapons
of war and more on education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other quality
of life issues that matter to the people of California in their daily lives.
Spending three percent of California’s $2.46 trillion Gross Domestic Product
(or 16% of our annual budget) on military defense would give us a military
defense budget of about $70-80 billion a year.
Why spend $70-80 billion a year to maintain a military apparatus in North
America where Canada defends itself with just $18 billion a year? Israel’s
military defense costs them $18 billion a year, too. In fact, California
spending even $70 billion a year on defense would afford us a military larger
than Russia’s – and Russia is 40 times larger than California.
By reducing military expenditures while adequately providing for our defense,
we will have about $50 billion more a year on top of the billions we retain
by the ending subsidies we pay to other states. Combined, this is about
$75 billion a year – and that’s after we fund the military! So all you need to
decide is how you want that money spent: improving your quality of life, or on
subsidies to other states and a bloated military budget?
QUESTION ? Q: “But if we spend less on the military, won’t we be invaded by another country?
A: California doesn’t pose a threat to any other country so there would be no risk
to California of being attacked by another country.
On top of that, this is the 21st Century. Unless you’re the Americans, countries
typically don’t amass armies, cross oceans, and invade other countries anymore.
The risks of the 21st Century come from non-state actors like terrorists, or through
economic or cyber warfare, not from conventional armies arriving at our shores
from abroad.
California has amassed over $400 billion in state debt – a figure that
is growing everyday and represents about 17 percent of California’s
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and slightly more than $11,000 for every
Californian. As bad as these figures seem, they are much better than those
for the United States as a whole where the national debt is over $19.5
trillion (and growing), or 105% of GDP, and nearly $60,000 per citizen.
During the transition from statehood to nationhood, California will agree to
assume its share of the U.S. national debt on a per capita basis. This will
reduce the national debt by nearly $2.4 trillion for the United States but
California’s exit also means the overall GDP of the United States will fall by
$2.46 trillion. Thus, although its national debt will fall to $17 trillion, the
debt-to-GDP ratio of the United States will rise to 110% of GDP.
At the same time, California’s exit will raise our debt to $2.79 trillion.
However, since California has paid approximately $120 billion more in
federal taxes than we have received in federal funding since 1981, we will
obtain a credit from the United States in that amount, reducing our total
debt from $2.79 trillion to approximately $2.67 trillion. Compared to our
sixth-largest-in-the-world economy, that means California’s national debt will
be about 108% of GDP, similar to the debt-to-GDP ratio in Belgium and two
points lower than in the United States under this scenario.
Honestly, these are not great numbers for California to deal with as a newly
independent country. However, the point to stress here is that California’s
current debt is just 17 percent of GDP and growing at a slower pace than
the national debt of the United States. Therefore, this leads us to conclude
that independence is a necessity because the longer we remain part of
the United States, the larger our share of its national debt is. So it’s a race
against a debt clock in a situation that worsens with every passing second.
QUESTION ? Q: “Why is a per-capita share of the debt a fair amount?
A: Assuming the national debt on a per capita basis means California will
assume a share of the national debt proportional to its share of the US
population so each Californian’s share of the national debt is accounted for.
This is actually quite generous. California has not only recently been a source
of taxes to subsidize other states, but also a source of natural resources from
which the United States owes its very existence. General Grant, who became
President four years after the American Civil War, said of California’s support
for the Union during that conflict: “I do not know what we would do in this
great national emergency if it were not for the gold sent from California.”
So, California has a long history of sending its riches – be it gold or dollars – to
keep the Union alive and well and we believe we’ve already paid our debt.
Q: “What do you mean by “it’s a race against the clock”?
A: The debt-to-GDP ratio is getting worse every year. What will our share of the
national debt be in 2030 when it is projected to reach $30 trillion?
As stated, the current figures are bad enough. If we accept that the US
national debt will continue to grow, then we must also accept that our share of
that debt will also grow as long as we are a part of that country.
It is not just the $19.4 trillion national debt, either. Federal debt held by the
public is projected to nearly double over the next 30 years to 141% of GDP by
2046. Eventually, this will make the Union fiscally unsustainable. Assuming
the Union will inevitably collapse under the weight of its debt, the longer we
wait to exit the Union, the larger our share of its debt will be. So, would you
rather take $2.4 trillion now, or $3.6 trillion in 2030?
An independent California may eventually have its own currency but that is
a question to be answered in future elections. The day after independence,
California can continue using the U.S. Dollar and if anyone tells you
something different, they are lying.
That is because the U.S. Dollar is a “fully-tradeable” international currency,
which means any country can use it if it wants to without requiring the U.S.
Government’s permission. Many countries have already done away with
their own currency and instead use international ones like the U.S. Dollar, so
having our own currency is not something we absolutely must have.
Medicaid is administered by the individual states but subject to federal
requirements. This means California already has the infrastructure to
continue running this important healthcare program and delivering its
benefits as an independent country. While the program is funded jointly by
the state and federal government, independence means the taxes you pay
to the U.S. Government that fund Medicaid today will simply be diverted to
Sacramento to continue funding it tomorrow. Indeed, while this healthcare
program may continue under a different name in an independent California,
the program itself certainly will continue – with the added benefit that federal
requirements will no longer apply to it, putting complete control of the
program exclusively into our hands.
Medicare is administered entirely by the U.S. Government and paid for with
your federal taxes. While this important Social Security program provides
health insurance coverage to persons over the age of 65, it does not cover
100% of all costs. As is the case with Medicaid, an independent California
will be able to administer a program to continue this important health
coverage with the federal taxes you currently pay to the federal government
that will instead be paid to Sacramento. By doing so, California (instead of
the federal government) will have control of who, what, when, where, and
how much is covered by the program.
Remember, California’s independence will never deprive you of your U.S.
citizenship – you will simply become eligible for dual citizenship in California
and will suddenly be living in a foreign country. The good news is that won’t
affect your retirement benefits. The Social Security Administration says
that U.S. citizens living outside the United States may continue to receive
retirement payments “as long as you are eligible for payment and you are in
a country where we can send payments.”
By the way, collecting your Social Security retirement benefits as a U.S.
citizen living in another country also means you will still be automatically
covered by premium-free Medicare Part A if you visit the United States and
need additional coverage while there. You will also be eligible for coverage
under Part B. In short, you will not lose your citizenship, your health
insurance coverage or your Social Security retirement benefits by voting yes
on the California independence referendum.
Even with the water shortages we faced in 2014, California’s 76,400 farms
produced $54 billion that year – a more than five percent increase in cash
receipts from 2013. No other state in the county has a larger agricultural
output than California so it is no doubt that this industry is a very important
part of California’s economy.
About half of California’s water is used for environmental purposes such
as maintaining habitats and scenic rivers or keeping seawater out of the
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, which is an important source of
our drinking water. Another 40 percent of California’s water is used for
agricultural irrigation while urban usage represents the remaining ten
percent of water usage.
Technological innovation has allowed for agricultural and urban water usage
to decline although farm production and the population continues to grow
each year. This is good news for the environment as well as the economy.
While an independent California will continue to foster the technological
innovation and promote the environmental conservation that has led to
the decline in water usage across California, independence means we can
actually increase the water supply. More water means California’s $2.46
trillion economy – the sixth largest in the world – can continue to expand
because farmers will be able to grow more crops and we as a nation will be
able to support an ever-growing population.
In normal years, the snowpack supplies about 30 percent of California’s
water as it melts in the spring and early summer. The larger the snowpack,
the greater the likelihood California’s reservoirs will receive ample runoff.
However, this snow and the associated runoff is on federal lands and
managed by federal agencies subject to the federal budget. The problem is
the federal government is mismanaging these lands by allowing the forests
of the Sierra Nevada mountains to become too dense. Not only does that
negatively affect the health of our forests and increase the likelihood of
forest fires, but more trees means that more water is being consumed and
therefore there is less runoff.
As an independent country, we will take control of our forests. This will put
us in position to increase mechanical thinning and restore meadows. In
doing so, we will allow our beautiful Sequoias to grow and flourish, reduce
the threat of forest fires, and increase the water supply available for
hydropower, agriculture, and urban water usage – the economic benefits of
which would be sufficient to cover the costs of these restoration projects.
Not only has the federal government mismanaged our forests but they have
also been allowing private corporations to extract California’s groundwater
from these forests with permits that have been expired since the late
1980s. While this does not represent a huge portion of our water supply,
every drop counts – especially in a drought.
An independent California will have oversight authority to not only make sure
that private companies extracting our groundwater for profit are operating
with valid permits, but also that they adequately compensate the people of
California for this precious resource. The federal government permits these
companies to extract millions of gallons of our water for just $527 a year!
On top of all this, because we will no longer be subsidizing other states
and also spending less on the military, an independent California will have
more money to pay for the maintenance of existing water infrastructure
facilities – such as those near Sacramento, one of the most “at-risk” areas
for a catastrophic flood resulting from levee failure, as well as new projects,
including Eco-friendly desalination along the coast.
Much of the money the federal government spends maintaining
transportation infrastructure in California come from the federal excise
taxes on gasoline we pay at the pump. There is also a state excise tax on
gasoline which Sacramento collects to upkeep transportation infrastructure
maintained by the state of California.
When California becomes an independent country, these excise taxes
will remain in place (if they haven’t already been replaced by a per-mile
tax scheme first) but all of them will be collected by Sacramento so that
California’s Department of Transportation, CalTrans, can use these funds to
take care of all the transportation infrastructure that is currently maintained
by the state government, and assume responsibility for the transportation
infrastructure that is currently in maintained by the federal government.
And there will be no loss or reduction in funding. In fact, there will actually
more funding for transportation infrastructure because again California
receives less in federal funding than it contributes. An analysis of Federal
Highway Trust Fund payments versus state apportionments shows that
between 1994 – 2013, California received about $0.94 from the federal
government for each dollar in federal gasoline excise taxes paid by drivers
across the state of California everyday.
So the question you need to answer is: do you want all the excise taxes you
pay on gasoline to maintain roads in California, or do you want a portion of
those taxes, your highway funds, to maintain roads in the 49 other states?
California already has its own education system from Kindergarten to
Graduate school. In fact, the California Institute of Technology and Stanford
University are respectively ranked as the first and third best universities in
the world – straddling Oxford University which holds the number two spot.
Together, four of the top 20 universities in the world are in California.
However, both the California Institute of Technology and Stanford University,
which represent California so well in the global rankings, are private
universities. That means they are not subsidized by tax dollars from the state
or federal government and instead rely on tuition and private contributions
for funding. Many universities in California are private.
When it comes to taxpayer-funded public universities, a great deal of funding
does come from the federal government. However, federal funds exist
because you pay federal taxes. When California becomes an independent
country, the federal taxes you pay to the U.S. Government will instead be
paid to California’s Franchise Tax Board. This means that funding for public
colleges and universities and all the programs and grants that help students
afford college will continue at their current levels (or even increase) without
raising any new taxes.
This goes back to the recurring themes of this campaign. For the past
two decades, we have been paying an average of $16 billion more in
federal taxes than we have been receiving in federal funds each year. In
an independent California, you will pay the same taxes but you won’t lose
$16 billion a year by sending this money to Washington, D.C. first. So, we
will actually have more money available for education in an independent
California but with the added benefit of finally cutting the strings the
federal government attaches to federal funds in order to coerce us into
implementing their education policies.
Only one country has ever invaded California – the United States. Modernday
California doesn’t have military enemies and in fact, there are 23
countries in the world, including Iceland and Panama, that do not have a
regular military and yet they manage to remain free from invasion. Unlike
these countries, however, California will have a military that is ample for our
defense in North America.
What does ample for our defense in North America mean? Well, Canada
defends itself with about $18 billion a year while Mexico protects itself with
even less. In fact, the global average for military budgets is about $17 billion
a year. Only the United States spends way more, so it is no surprise that this
country remains one of the only major industrialized countries in the world
that can’t guarantee healthcare, among other services, to all of its citizens.
An independent California will be able to refocus our priorities on these
important quality of life issues while still providing for the defense and
security of our country. However, independence does not mean the U.S.
military is going to leave California right away. Although this campaign does
not take many specific policy positions, instead leaving them to be decided
by future elections, we do take the position that California will negotiate a
military base agreement with the Americans.
These military base agreements will require the Americans to lease the
land their bases are on just like they do in many countries around the world.
These leases will bring in revenue each year that we can use to subsidize
California’s defense and national security budget. Perhaps most importantly,
an independent California will be more secure and at less risk of attack
simply because we will no longer be involved in all of America’s military
activities that actually perpetuate and instigate terrorism around the world.
One key element of nationhood is international recognition. Once we have
voted in favor of independence through an honest referendum, we will be
able to request international recognition of our independence. As such,
California will then apply for membership in the United Nations and ratify its
Charter. Joining the United Nations will provide California with many benefits,
including a greater platform and more influence to affect the changes we
want to see in the world.
Although this campaign draws many comparisons between the Brexit
vote and our independence referendum, one of the key differences is that
the Brexit vote was about the United Kingdom leaving the international
community (i.e. the European Union) while our independence referendum
is about California joining the international community. Therefore, one way
to fully integrate an independent California and our diverse population is to
join the International Criminal Court and that will be an option available to
us as an independent country. Doing so will provide California with another
platform to influence the direction of world affairs.
California is currently the sixth largest economy in the world based on
its Gross Domestic Product. At more than $2.46 trillion, our economy is
larger than the French or Russian economies. That means an independent
California will be a major economic player on the world stage and be
deserving of a seat in the Group of Eight (G8), a political forum of the world’s
eight major industrialized countries. This will provide California yet another
platform to participate in world affairs and steer the course of history on the
world stage.
Aside from gaining a new platform to exert our positive influence around
the world in the United Nations, the International Criminal Court and in the
Group of Eight, California as an independent country can and should join
many other intergovernmental organizations. Some of these organizations
include the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International
Monetary Fund, the Organization of American States, and the Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development. From combating global poverty
to collective security, the possibilities and influence we will have on the world
stage as an independent country far eclipse the opportunities provided to us
by remaining part of a broken and dysfunctional Congress as U.S. state. WILL WE HAVE OUR OWN OLYMPIC TEAM?
There are currently three official Olympic Training Centers in the United
States and one of them is in California. That puts California in a strong
position to establish our own Olympic Committee to support, enter and
oversee Californian athletes and teams for the Olympic Games.
California is the home of many great athletes. In all, 22% of the 2016 U.S.
Olympic Team, some 124 out of 554 athletes, were Californians – even
though California represents just 12% of the population of the United States.
This is one way we can bring
gold to California for once.
While the act of California becoming an independent country will not affect
your U.S. citizenship, California will indeed become a foreign country. As
such, not only will we have an international border with Mexico to the south
but we will suddenly have international borders to our east with Arizona and
Nevada, and to our north, with Oregon.
As a U.S. citizen, your travel to the United States will not be impaired but you
may need to show your passport when the cross the border depending on
your mode of travel. For travel by air, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
says that all US citizens entering the United States from within the Western
Hemisphere must present a passport. However, the United States has
various international programs for travelers entering the United States.
One is the NEXUS program, which enables U.S. citizens to travel between
Canada and the United States more quickly and easily by using automated
self-serve kiosks in the air mode of travel, dedicated lanes in the land mode
of travel, and by calling Telephone Reporting Centers prior to arrival in the
marine mode of travel.
Another program is Global Entry. Global Entry is a U.S. Customs and Border
Protection program that allows expedited clearance for pre-approved, lowrisk
travelers upon arrival in the United States by air. Global Entry kiosks
are already in place at airports in Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San
Francisco, and San Jose.
Between these programs, as well as SENTRI and FAST, an independent
California will work with the U.S. Government to facilitate U.S. citizen travel
to and from California. However, even without such a program in place,
U.S. citizens entering the United States by land, such as by driving across
the border into Nevada, may do so with a passport, a passport card, or an
enhanced driver’s license.
Currently, Sacramento has zero foreign embassies but Bulgaria, Denmark,
Hungary, and Italy have honorary consulates – facilities that do not provide
the full range of services typically available at embassies and consulates.
With over 190 countries in the world, when Sacramento becomes a national
capital of an independent republic, we will welcome nations to set up
diplomatic posts to facilitate international relations with us and to provide
services to their citizens visiting or residing in California, as well as for
Californians interested in visiting or doing business abroad.
This will completely transform Sacramento as local businesses, contractors,
and workers build many of these embassies and the infrastructure that
will be necessary to support them and their staff. The presence of foreign
embassies in Sacramento will spur growth in all sectors of the local and
national economy. Embassies will help bring more foreign investment and
international tourism to California, and improve trade relations.
Likewise, an independent California will set up embassies and consulates
in other countries. Interestingly, we already have trade missions in China
and Israel. Those trade missions would need to be expanded to handle
diplomatic and other consular affairs. More embassies would be established
in the capital cities of other countries as well.
While this will incur great upfront costs, the presence of embassies in
foreign countries improve tourism by up to 30% (even more so in developing
countries) and each foreign mission raises bilateral exports from 6-10%.
Combined with other benefits of establishing embassies and consulates
abroad, the economic benefits of establishing them will be well worth the
investment. California already is the number one place in the United States
for direct foreign investment.
California is a unique place – the home of forty million souls who collectively
make up the sixth largest economy in the world. We have the people, the
resources, and the economy to make it as an independent country.
When the time comes to make a decision in the ballot box in 2019 on
whether to vote yes or no on the Calexit independence referendum,
remember no matter the results of the referendum, you will not lose your
U.S. citizenship or any of the benefits, services, or privileges that are
afforded to U.S. citizens.
Nothing will change overnight. The day after the historic independence vote,
California will still be a state and still have representation in Washington
and you will unfortunately still have to pay your federal taxes. Voting yes
on independence will simply express your will that California becomes an
independent country. In order for that to actually happen, the government of
California and the government of the United States will have to negotiate the
details over a couple of years.
We highlight these two points first and foremost because the fear-mongers
of the U.S. government and those who would prefer that California remain
subservient to Washington are going to try and scare you into voting against
independence by raising questions about citizenship issues and by implying
that economic and/or political anarchy will ensue if the referendum passes.
This is not the case. With that settled, keep in mind the following points:
1. California loses an average of $16 billion each year by remaining a U.S.
state. That is the deficit between the amount of federal taxes we pay each
year versus the amount of federal spending in California.
2. As an independent country, we can adjust the amount of spending we
allocate for weapons of war to an amount more consistent with our values
as peace-loving Californians. This will free upwards of $50 billion a year
and get Californians out of the business of subsidizing the United States’
imperialist and militaristic foreign agenda while adequate providing for our
defense in North America.
3. With these funds freed up, an independent California will be able to
improve the quality of life of our people by reinvesting in schools, hospitals,
and infrastructure. We will be able to do this while maintaining every job,
agency, program, grant, and service that you currently receive from the
state or federal government. However, with an entire level of government
bureaucracy eliminated (the federal government), there is bound to be quite
a bit of streamlining which will save even more taxpayer money.
4. These savings will not only improve the budget situation in California, but
it will allow us to over time pay down our debt and perhaps even eliminate
some taxes and fees – taxes and fees we have to pay today to make up for
the loss of billions of dollars a year in a tax deficit with Washington.
5. Lastly, California not only has the potential to do so much better for our
own people by managing our own affairs, but as an independent country we
will have the capacity to help build a better world. Building a better world
is what California is all about. It is unfortunate that today we find ourselves
stuck in a country that is making the world more dangerous and divided.
Let’s change that.



�The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.� � Psalms 9:17

To any asute observer, the world is rapidly slipping into highly organized and insidious levels of evil and debauchery, the pinnacle of which will be economic.

A digital, cashless, cloud computer based global economic system is rapidly in formation and will culminate into what is known in Holy Scripture as the dreaded, �Mark of the Beast� (see Revelations 13).

In such as system, all forms of paper and metal cash and currency will be eliminated- that includes gold and silver. What will emerge will be a cashless, computerized system of buying and selling controlled by a ruthless, dictatorial global JEWISH central banking cartel based in the European Union.

Instantaneous global communications, with the internet as its backbone, will become the hub through which this hellish/beast system will operate from. Already, a prison/police state infrastructure has formed worldwide, complete with the installation and operation of ubiquitous surveillance cameras in nearly all of our public and private businesses and institutions.

The TSA (Transportation Security Agency), a division of the US Dept of Homeland Security in the USA, is conducting ILLEGAL searches and seizures of persons and property at our airports in direct violation of the 4th amendment which protects US citizens from such police state oppression. As long as Americans submit to this level of police state tyranny, it will persist. Non-cooperation with these nazi gestapo tyrants will bring their authority, madness, insanity and intrusion to an end.

Illegal searches and seizures of cell phone, internet communications and GPS location movements are also now already being carried out and cached by international intelligence centers- The NSA, GCHQ, Mossad etc- and most private/ corporate telecommunications providers. These businesses and government institutions are completely violating individual personal privacy rights and are illegally establishing consumer, medical, psychological, criminal police state dossiers and biometric profile databases on nearly every person on Earth without their knowledge, permission or consent. What has emerged is a global, fascist, mafia/military based demonic nazi police state- a new global 4th reich- hell-bent on tracking, monitoring, spying, surveiling and controlling everything and everyone on Earth. The people who fund, run and operate this system are pathologically and psychotically insane, demonically possessed and satanically inspired control freaks of the highest order.

As per holy scripture, a �mark� will soon be put on one�s right hand or forehead, without which, one will NOT be able to buy nor sell. To the upright and righteous: DO NOT submit nor take this mark, for it is designed to DAMN the souls of the wicked. All who take the mark WILL be cast into Hell Fire at the Judgement. To all the nazi, fascist, police state filth who install, support and operate this hellish, militarized system of enslavement, surveillance, control and manipulation, i have one word of advice for you: TAKE THE MARK (and you WILL take the mark) and DAMN your souls forever into the inferno of Hell. Punished and in torment you will be for the rest of eternity for the CRIMES you have all willfully and maliciously committed. To all concerned, rest assured, this hellish control freak fascist police state Penopticon will be completely CRUSHED out of existence at the Judgement, never to rise again.

The Great Bifurcation is here. Those who submit and those who DO NOT submit to the coming mark of the beast. To those who submit: its time to DAMN your souls and be BURNED ALIVE in eternal Hell-Fire for the rest of eternity- a most fitting recompense. To those who DO NOT submit, i offer you my strength, honor and perseverance for the coming time of great tribulation upon the Earth. Great will be your reward in Heaven, for it is YOU who will triumph in the world to come.


Jonas the Prophet
Death Valley, California